From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Horlock v. Horlock
Texas Court of Appeals
533 S.W.2d 52 (1975)
Facts
Dorothy Horlock (plaintiff) and Roy Horlock (defendant) were married. Before the marriage, Roy Horlock became a successful businessman and had over $900,000 of separate-property funds contained in an investment account. During the marriage, Roy commingled these separate-property funds with community-property funds in the same account. Roy used his separate-property funds throughout the marriage to increase the total funds in the account to $3 million. Dorothy filed for a divorce and asked the court to establish the $3 million estate as community property. Roy’s separate-property funds were so commingled with the community-property funds that Roy did not even attempt to trace his separate property in the account at trial. However, the trial court held that although the $3 million estate was community property, Roy was entitled to a reimbursement of his initial separate property because that property had been used to increase the value of the community-property estate. Dorothy appealed, arguing that Roy was not entitled to reimbursement because Roy presented no evidence to show that his original separate property was used to benefit the community estate.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Coulson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.