Horlock v. Horlock

533 S.W.2d 52 (1975)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...

Horlock v. Horlock

Texas Court of Appeals

533 S.W.2d 52 (1975)

Facts

Dorothy Horlock (plaintiff) and Roy Horlock (defendant) were married. Before the marriage, Roy Horlock became a successful businessman and had over $900,000 of separate-property funds contained in an investment account. During the marriage, Roy commingled these separate-property funds with community-property funds in the same account. Roy used his separate-property funds throughout the marriage to increase the total funds in the account to $3 million. Dorothy filed for a divorce and asked the court to establish the $3 million estate as community property. Roy’s separate-property funds were so commingled with the community-property funds that Roy did not even attempt to trace his separate property in the account at trial. However, the trial court held that although the $3 million estate was community property, Roy was entitled to a reimbursement of his initial separate property because that property had been used to increase the value of the community-property estate. Dorothy appealed, arguing that Roy was not entitled to reimbursement because Roy presented no evidence to show that his original separate property was used to benefit the community estate.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Coulson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 630,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,200 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership