Hornback v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
2008 WI 98, 313 Wis. 2d 294, 752 N.W.2d 862 (2008)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Gary Kazmarek, a Catholic school teacher, sexually abused schoolchildren at the St. Bernard School in the Madison Diocese (defendant) in Madison, Wisconsin. The Madison Diocese knew about Kazmarek’s sexual misconduct. In 1967, Kazmarek left the Madison Diocese and went to work at Our Mother of Sorrows, a Catholic school in the Louisville Archdiocese of Louisville, Kentucky. The Madison Diocese did not warn Our Mother of Sorrows or the Louisville Archdiocese about Kazmarek’s sexual misconduct. The Louisville Archdiocese did not contact the Madison Diocese for information about Kazmarek. Kenneth Hornback (plaintiff) was sexually abused by Kazmarek while studying at Our Mother of Sorrows. Hornback successfully sued Kazmarek and Our Mother of Sorrows for the sexual abuse. Then, in October 2002, Hornback discovered Kazmarek had sexually abused children in Madison Diocese before working at Our Mother of Sorrows. Hornback sued Madison Diocese for negligence, arguing that Madison Diocese’s failure to warn the Louisville Archdiocese about Kazmarek’s sexual misconduct caused Hornback’s sexual abuse and related injuries. Madison Diocese moved to dismiss, arguing that Hornback’s claim was (1) barred by the statute of limitations; and (2) barred by public policy. The trial court dismissed Hornback’s case, and the appellate court affirmed. Hornback appealed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Butler, Jr., J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.