Hort v. Commissioner
United States Supreme Court
313 U.S. 28 (1941)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
In 1928, Hort (plaintiff) acquired an office building from his father. At the time, Irving Trust Co. (Irving) was renting the first floor of the building. Irving had been renting the first floor in a lease set to expire in 1932. However, in 1927, Irving entered into a new lease with Hort’s father for a fifteen-year term set to begin upon expiration of the original lease, at an annual rental fee of $25,000. In 1933, Irving decided to close its branch in Hort’s building. Hort agreed to cancel the lease in return for a payment of $140,000. Hort did not include the payment as income in 1933. Instead, he reported a loss of $21,494.75, the amount he relinquished by releasing Irving for less than the full value of the lease. The Commissioner (defendant) included the $140,000 in Hort’s gross income for that year and disallowed Hort’s claimed loss. The Board of Tax Appeals and the Court of Appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.