Horton v. California
United States Supreme Court
496 U.S. 128 (1990)
The police obtained probable cause that Horton (defendant) was the one responsible for an armed robbery. The police obtained a warrant to search Horton’s home only for the proceeds of the robbery, though the affidavit for the warrant also described the weapons used in the robbery and not just the proceeds. Pursuant to the warrant, the police searched Horton’s home where they did not find the proceeds of the robbery but they did find the weapons used in the robbery lying in plain view. At trial, a police officer testified that he was interested in finding the weapons while he searched Horton’s home, so the weapons were not found “inadvertently.” The trial court allowed the evidence of the weapons to be admitted at trial and Horton was convicted.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.