Hospicomm, Inc. v. Fleet Bank, N.A.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
338 F. Supp. 2d 578 (2004)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Hospicomm, Inc. (Hospicomm) (plaintiff) contracted to provide management services for Hamilton Continuing Care Center (Hamilton). Pursuant to the agreement, Hospicomm opened bank accounts with Fleet Bank, N.A. (Fleet) (defendant) on Hamilton’s behalf. Only authorized persons holding valid transfer cards issued by Fleet were permitted to access the accounts. Hospicomm eventually learned that a former employee, Guillermo Martinez, had gained unauthorized access to the accounts after requesting and receiving from Fleet a Visa automated teller machine (ATM) card. Martinez used the ATM card to withdraw more than $148,000. Hospicomm reimbursed Hamilton for the stolen funds. Hospicomm then filed suit against Fleet, arguing that Fleet had violated the duty of good faith required by Pennsylvania’s Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 4 when Fleet issued the ATM card to Martinez without informing Hospicomm or Hamilton and when Fleet failed to discover the suspicious account transactions. Fleet filed a motion to dismiss, contending that UCC Article 4 did not apply to ATM card transactions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Surrick, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.