Houchins v. KQED
United States Supreme Court
438 U.S. 1 (1978)
Facts
Houchins (defendant), sheriff of Alameda County, controls all access to the Alameda County Jail. KQED (plaintiff) operates licensed television and radio broadcasting stations and requested permission to inspect and take pictures within the Greystone facility. After permission was refused, KQED and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) filed suit in federal district court, claiming that the denial of access violated the First Amendment. Shortly after the suit was filed, Houchins announced a change in prison policy and opened up the prison to regular public tours. News media were permitted early access to tours, although no cameras or tape recorders were allowed. Inmates were generally hidden from view and were not permitted to be interviewed. Additionally, only limited areas of the prison were included on the tour. The district court preliminarily enjoined Houchins from excluding KQED personnel and other news media representatives from all parts of the jail, as well as from preventing their use of photographic and sound equipment, and conduction of interviews. The court of appeals affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
Concurrence (Stewart, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
