Hougum v. Valley Memorial Homes

574 N.W.2d 812 (1998)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hougum v. Valley Memorial Homes

North Dakota Supreme Court
574 N.W.2d 812 (1998)

Facts

Moran, a loss-prevention manager for Sears, Roebuck and Company (Sears) (defendant), went into Sears’s public restroom to use the toilet. The toilet stall was next to another stall, and there was a small hole in the partition between the stalls. There was no evidence that Sears had drilled the hole; instead, evidence showed that the department store had covered the hole with a metal plate and that unknown persons repeatedly removed the plate. Moran reached down to grab toilet paper when he saw Daniel Hougum (plaintiff) masturbating in the next stall. Moran called the police, and Hougum was arrested. Hougum, an ordained minister, lost his job as a chaplain as a result of the incident and later pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct. Hougum sued Sears (among others) for, as relevant here, invasion of privacy by intrusion on seclusion. The trial court granted Sears’s motion for summary judgment, and Hougum appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Neumann, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership