Houser by Houser v. Dan Dugan Transport Co.

361 N.W.2d 62 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Houser by Houser v. Dan Dugan Transport Co.

Minnesota Supreme Court
361 N.W.2d 62 (1985)

Facts

In October 1981, Russell Houser was killed during a truck accident while in the course and scope of his employment with Dan Dugan Transport Company (Dugan) (defendant). Russell’s widow, Glennice Houser, filed for workers’-compensation benefits, claiming dependency benefits for herself, her minor son, and her granddaughter, Nichole Houser. Nichole’s father, Timothy Houser, only contributed to Nichole’s hospitalization insurance and occasionally her babysitter. Nichole came to live with Russell and Glennice in July 1979 and had been living with them since she was 10 months old. Nichole had her own bedroom there, and her grandparents provided all her food and clothing. The grandparents also contributed significantly to Nichole’s support. Most of the discipline of Nichole came from her grandparents, and they both claimed Nichole as their dependent on their 1980 tax returns. Despite all of this, Dugan contested the dependency of Nichole. The workers’-compensation judge denied benefits for Nichole, finding that she was not a child under the workers’-compensation statutes. Glennice appealed. The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals reversed the decision and awarded dependency benefits.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kelley, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership