Houston Bellaire, Ltd. v. TCP LB Portfolio I, L.P.
Texas Court of Appeals
981 S.W.2d 916 (1998)
Developers purchased two adjacent tracts of land as a part of a two-phase office-building project, although technically different entities owned each tract. The developers completed a building on the north tract in 1977 and one on the south tract in 1980. Instead of building a separate driveway, the developers widened the existing one, located entirely on the north tract. In 1986, the predecessor of Houston Bellaire, Ltd. (defendant) purchased the north building out of foreclosure. In 1996, TCP LB Portfolio I, L.P. (plaintiff) began negotiations to purchase the south building and asked Houston for a cross-easement agreement allowing use of the north building’s driveway and parking lots. Houston refused, intending to build a wall between the properties, but offered TCP a lease. TCP purchased the south building without agreeing to the lease. Both buildings used the driveway and parking lots until 1997, when Houston began building a fence. TCP sued to establish its right to an easement. The trial court granted TCP an easement by implication. Houston appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hedges, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.