Commission of Appeals of Texas
161 S.W.2d 474 (Tex. Comm’n App. 1942)
Pearl Davis (plaintiff) filed suit against Houston Oxygen Co. (HOC) (defendant) for injuries that Charles Applebhy, Davis’s minor son, sustained in a car accident. HOC sought to introduce certain testimony of Jack Sanders, who was driving with Sally Cooper on the road when the accident occurred. Sanders planned to testify that as a Plymouth car (in which Applebhy was riding) drove past them, Cooper stated to him that “they must have been drunk, that we would find them somewhere on the road wrecked if they kept that rate of speed up.” The trial court excluded the evidence as hearsay and found in favor of Davis. The Court of Civil Appeals of Texas affirmed. HOC appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Taylor, Comm’r.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.