Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive Board

417 U.S. 249 (1974)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive Board

United States Supreme Court
417 U.S. 249 (1974)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

The Grissoms owned and operated a hotel and restaurant as a Howard Johnson Company (HoJo) (defendant) franchise. The Hotel and Restaurant Employees Union (plaintiff) represented their employees in two bargaining units. Both collective-bargaining agreements (CBAs) required arbitration and bound successors. The Grissoms gave up their franchise and leased the property to HoJo to operate directly. HoJo wrote the Grissoms, stating it would not be bound by existing labor agreements. The Grissoms told all the employees they would be terminated in two weeks when HoJo took over operations. Two days later, HoJo notified the union it would not recognize it or assume CBA obligations. HoJo hired new employees and started operating with 45 employees, including nine who had worked for the Grissoms, but all supervisors were new. The union sued to compel HoJo to arbitrate, arguing the CBAs required HoJo to hire all the former Grissom employees. Both lower courts held HoJo had to arbitrate. The Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

Dissent (Douglas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership