Howard v. Dorr Woolen Co.
New Hampshire Supreme Court
120 N.H. 295 (1980)
- Written by Katrina Sumner, JD
Facts
Franklin Baldwin worked for Dorr Woolen Company (defendant) until his employment was terminated for economic reasons when he was 50 years old. Baldwin died at the age of 51. After his death, Baldwin’s widow (plaintiff) and the administrator of his estate, Robert Howard III (plaintiff), filed suit against Dorr Woolen Company. Howard alleged that Baldwin’s termination had been due to his age and his health and, therefore, in bad faith. Howard argued that recovery was warranted in this case under the New Hampshire Supreme Court’s prior ruling in Monge that terminating an at-will employee in bad faith constituted a breach of contract.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bois, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.