Howe v. Goldcorp Investments, Ltd.

946 F.2d 944 (1991)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Howe v. Goldcorp Investments, Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
946 F.2d 944 (1991)

Facts

Reginald Howe (plaintiff) was an American shareholder of Goldcorp Investments, Ltd. (Goldcorp) (defendant). Goldcorp was a Canadian corporation. Its shares traded on Canadian stock exchanges, not United States stock exchanges. Goldcorp had limited contacts with the United States. It sold shares to United States residents only if the shares were bought in Canada. It sent annual reports and similar materials, including to American shareholders, but as part of general worldwide mailings. It distributed dividends to shareholders wherever shareholders lived, not just to the United States. Goldcorp employees occasionally communicated with and responded to questions from American stockbrokers. Goldcorp’s American shareholders, including Howe, owned nearly one-third of its shares. Goldcorp acquired two companies that owned assets in the United States and had some American shareholders and thus had to comply with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Goldcorp’s shares fell dramatically after it acquired the two companies. Howe sued Goldcorp in the United States for fraud, misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, and alleged violations of securities laws and other statutes. Except for Howe, no other resident of the United States had any relevant knowledge about these allegations. The district court dismissed the action based on forum non conveniens. Howe appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership