Howes v. Fields
United States Supreme Court
565 U.S. 499, 132 S.Ct. 1181, 182 L.Ed.2d 17 (2012)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Randall Fields (defendant) was in prison when a corrections officer pulled him from his cell. The officer escorted him to a conference room where two sheriff’s deputies interrogated him for five to seven hours. The deputies told Fields several times he was free to leave and return to his cell if he did not want to cooperate but never gave him Miranda warnings. Fields eventually confessed to sex acts with a 12-year-old boy. After his conviction, Fields sought federal habeas relief on the ground that his confession was impermissibly obtained during custodial interrogation without Miranda warnings. The Sixth Circuit agreed, reasoning that interrogating a prisoner isolated from the general prison population and about events outside prison is always custodial. The United States Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Alito, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 795,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.