United States Supreme Court
496 U.S. 356 (1990)
Howlett (plaintiff), a Florida high school student, brought an action in the Circuit Court for Pinellas County under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the county school board and three school officials including Rose (defendants). Howlett’s complaint alleged violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and like provisions of the Florida Constitution. The court dismissed his suit on the grounds that Florida had not waived its sovereign immunity so as to permit a state court to hear a § 1983 action against a school district. Florida circuit courts had in the past, however, entertained § 1983 suits against individual public officials, similar state-law claims against state defendants, and tort suits by private citizens against state entities including school boards. Howlett petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.