Michigan Supreme Court
30 Mich. 181 (1874)
Jeffers (defendant) owned and operated a saw mill. The mill had a chimney from which sparks were seen to escape regularly. The mill was located near a hotel owned and operated by Hoyt (plaintiff). Hoyt’s hotel caught fire and burned down. No one saw the fire begin or what caused the fire, but Hoyt believed sparks emanating from Jeffers’ mill through its chimney caused the fire. Jeffers had increased the height of the chimney just prior to the fire, but sparks had been seen to escape both before and after the chimney was changed. Hoyt filed suit and the matter went to trial. Hoyt was permitted to introduce evidence showing that sparks had escaped from the chimney on previous occasions, that there had been previous fires due to the sparks, that the hotel had been set on fire previously due to the sparks, and that clothes hanging on clothes lines near the mill had often had holes burnt in them or were sooty due to the sparks. Jeffers objected to the entry of the evidence, claiming that the chimney had been substantially changed since the incidents referred to in Hoyt’s evidence. The jury entered a verdict for Hoyt. Jeffers appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Christiancy, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.