From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Hubbard v. Utz Quality Foods, Inc.
United States District Court for the Western District of New York
903 F.Supp. 444 (1995)
On April 20, 1992, Daniel Hubbard (plaintiff), a potato farmer, and UTZ Quality Foods, Inc. (UTZ) (defendant), a potato chip manufacturer, entered an installment contract under which Hubbard agreed to supply potatoes to UTZ. The most detailed aspect of the contract governed UTZ’s quality standards. Among a number of quality standards, UTZ required that Hubbard’s potatoes meet the #1 or #2 color designation as set out by the 1978 Snack Food Association’s Fry Color Chart. Hubbard sent UTZ a sample of his potatoes. UTZ rejected Hubbard’s submitted potatoes due to their failure to meet the #1 or #2 color designation. Hubbard thereafter brought suit for the full contract price of $68,750.00.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Larimer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 516,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 516,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.