Huber v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

486 F.3d 480 (2007)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
H
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Huber v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
486 F.3d 480 (2007)

Play video

Facts

Huber (plaintiff) worked as a grocery-order filler for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart) (defendant). While working as an order filler, Huber permanently injured her arm and hand, and she could no longer perform the essential tasks of that job position. Huber asked Wal-Mart to grant her a reasonable accommodation by reassigning her to a vacant router position. Huber was qualified for the router job. Wal-Mart maintained a policy of hiring the most qualified job applicant for all positions. As a result, Wal-Mart declined to grant Huber an automatic transfer and required that she compete with other applicants for the router position. Wal-Mart hired a more qualified applicant. Wal-Mart eventually assigned Huber to a different, lower-paying position in another facility. Huber sued Wal-Mart under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., arguing that the statute required Wal-Mart to grant her automatic preference over other qualified applicants as a reasonable accommodation of her disability. The district court granted summary judgment in Huber’s favor, and Wal-Mart appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Riley, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Disability Law
Employment Law

Key Terms