Huelskamp v. Huelskamp
Ohio Court of Appeals
925 N.E.2d 167 (2009)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Timothy Huelskamp (defendant) and Amy Huelskamp (plaintiff) were married and had two children. Amy was the children’s primary caretaker for most of the children’s lives. Amy and Timothy’s relationship was very unsettled, and they argued often in front of the children. Amy filed for divorce in the Auglaize County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division. Initially, Amy and Timothy each filed a shared-parenting plan, and the guardian ad litem recommended shared parenting. However, given Amy and Timothy’s acrimonious relationship, the guardian ad litem recommended that any exchanges of the children under the shared-parenting plan be done in public places. At trial, Amy sought full legal custody of the children. The trial court held that cooperation under any shared-parenting plan would not be feasible, and thus that type of plan was not in the best interests of the children. The trial court granted Amy custody of the children and granted Timothy visitation rights. Timothy appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Williamowski, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
