Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp.
United States Supreme Court
426 U.S. 794 (1976)

- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
In 1969, the State of Maryland (the state) (defendant) enacted a statute that sought to rid the state of abandoned automobiles (known as “hulks”). Specifically, the statute was designed to accelerate the process by which vehicle suppliers sold hulks to scrap processors so that the processors could recycle the hulks into scrap metal. Under the statute, the state provided financial rewards (or “bounties”) to scrap processors that recycled hulks registered in Maryland. The bounties incentivized vehicle suppliers to sell hulks to scrap processors by allowing the processors to pay higher than normal prices for the hulks. Moreover, bounties were provided to both in-state and out-of-state scrap processors, so long as the scrap processors supplied documentation indicating that the hulks were registered in Maryland. However, in 1974, the state amended the statute, requiring more extensive documentation from out-of-state scrap processors than those located in Maryland. Out-of-state scrap processors, in turn, demanded more extensive documentation from vehicle suppliers. Hence, because of the 1974 amendment, it was easier for vehicle suppliers to sell hulks to in-state scrap processors, causing a decline in the number of hulks sold to out-of-state scrap processors. Alexandria Scrap Corporation (Alexandria) (plaintiff), a scrap processor located in Virginia, brought suit against the state, contending that the 1974 amendment burdened interstate commerce in violation of the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Alexandria. The state appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
Concurrence (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.