Hulsey v. Elsinore Parachute Center

214 Cal. Rptr. 194 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hulsey v. Elsinore Parachute Center

California Court of Appeal
214 Cal. Rptr. 194 (1985)

Facts

Anthony Hulsey (plaintiff) enrolled in a first-jump course given by Elsinore Parachute Center (Elsinore) (defendant). Although Hulsey did not remember filling out or signing the Parachute Center Adult Registration Form or the Agreement and Release of Liability, he admitted that the initials and signatures on the forms were his. Hulsey initialed next to a paragraph in all capital letters stating that he was aware that parachute jumping was a hazardous activity and that he voluntarily participated knowing the danger involved and agreed to accept all risk of injury. The third paragraph stated that Hulsey would not sue Elsinore for injury or damage resulting from negligence and that he would release and discharge Elsinore for all injury resulting from parachuting. The fourth paragraph, which had Hulsey’s signature on it, was in bold all-caps type and stated Hulsey read and fully understood the agreement. The release was printed in 10-point type for both capital and lowercase letters. Hulsey admitted he voluntarily enrolled in the first-jump course and was not coerced in any way during the registration process. During his jump, Hulsey hit nearby power lines and saw a bright flash. He next remembered regaining consciousness on the ground with a broken wrist. Hulsey sued Elsinore for negligence and strict liability. Hulsey argued that he could not have been expected to understand the agreement’s legal consequences and that the exculpatory contract should not be enforced because it would be unconscionable. Summary judgment was entered for Elsinore. The trial court was concerned with whether the agreement Hulsey signed was enforceable and whether sport parachuting is an extra-hazardous activity.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McDaniel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership