Hunt, Governor of the State of North Carolina v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission
United States Supreme Court
432 U.S. 333, 97 S. Ct. 2434 (1977)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
In 1972, the North Carolina Board of Agriculture adopted a regulation that required all apples shipped into the state in closed containers to display either the words “USDA grade” on their containers or nothing at all. Washington State growers imposed higher standards than United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) grade for the quality of their apples and opposed the regulation. The Washington State Apple Advertising Commission (plaintiff) challenged the regulation promulgated by Governor Hunt (defendant) as an unreasonable burden to interstate commerce. North Carolina defended its regulation by stating that it was a valid exercise of its state police powers to create uniformity in the apples brought into its markets and to protect its citizens from fraud and deception based on mislabeled apples. The District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina ruled that North Carolina’s regulation was invalid, and Hunt appealed directly to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.