Hunt v. Ferguson-Paulus Enterprises
Oregon Supreme Court
243 Or. 546, 415 P.2d 13 (1966)
- Written by Noah Lewis, JD
Facts
Mr. Hunt (plaintiff) purchased a cherry pie from a vending machine owned and maintained by Ferguson-Paulus Enterprises (Ferguson-Paulus) (defendant). Hunt bit into a cherry pit and broke his tooth. Hunt filed a lawsuit alleging breach of warranty of fitness of the pie for human consumption. Following a bench trial, the court found for Ferguson-Paulus. Hunt appealed, arguing the court erred (1) in finding in favor of Ferguson-Paulus, and (2) in refusing to enter special findings that Hunt and a reasonable consumer would not expect to find a pit in the cherry pie.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lusk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

