Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh

207 U.S. 161 (1907)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
H
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh

United States Supreme Court
207 U.S. 161 (1907)

  • Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD
Play video

Facts

Pursuant to a Pennsylvania state law, the city of Pittsburgh (defendant) petitioned to annex the city of Allegheny. After a hearing, the court found the petition reasonable and in conformity with the law and ordered an election. Most voters in both cities approved the measure, but most voters in Allegheny did not approve the measure. A court entered a decree annexing Allegheny to Pittsburgh. Allegheny citizens, voters, property owners, and taxpayers (Allegheny residents) (plaintiffs) filed 22 exceptions to the petition prior to the hearing. The court dismissed the exceptions, and the superior court and state supreme court affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted a writ of error.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moody, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Constitutional Law
Local Government

Key Terms