From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Hunter v. Erickson
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 385 (1969)
In 1964, the city council of Akron, Ohio (defendant) passed an ordinance guaranteeing equal housing opportunities regardless of characteristics such as race, national origin, or religion. But before the city implemented the ordinance, Akron’s voters passed a charter amendment that required voter approval of any ordinance regulating the sale or rental of real property based on those same characteristics. A black citizen, Nellie Hunter (plaintiff), sued to compel implementation of the 1964 ordinance. The Ohio trial court ruled that the charter amendment nullified the equal housing opportunity ordinance, and the Ohio Supreme Court agreed, finding the charter amendment did not violate the equal protection clause. Hunter appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Concurrence (Harlan, J.)
Dissent (Black, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.