Hunter v. Serv-Tech, Inc.

2009 WL 2858089 (2009)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
H
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hunter v. Serv-Tech, Inc.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
2009 WL 2858089 (2009)

Play video

Facts

Hunter (plaintiff) filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana against Offshore and others (defendants). Hunter served process on Offshore, and Offshore filed a motion to dismiss for defective service. The motion contained an “express reservation” of Offshore’s right to challenge personal jurisdiction, but did not raise an objection. Hunter amended his complaint on July 10, 2008. In its answer on September 11, 2008, Offshore objected to personal jurisdiction as an affirmative defense. Offshore’s initial motion to dismiss was denied, because Offshore admitted that Hunter had properly served process. Offshore then filed a second motion to dismiss, arguing that Offshore did not have sufficient contacts with the jurisdiction to justify the court’s personal jurisdiction. Hunter asserted that Offshore had waived any objection to personal jurisdiction by failing to include it in the original motion to dismiss. Offshore claimed that it did not waive the objection, because of its “express reservation” in the original motion. Offshore further argued that this reservation put all other parties on notice of its personal jurisdiction claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Engelhart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Civil Procedure

Key Terms

Related Videos