Hurley v. Hurley

309 N.W.2d 225 (1981)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hurley v. Hurley

Michigan Court of Appeals
309 N.W.2d 225 (1981)

SC

Facts

In 1960, James Hurley (defendant) and Phyllis Hurley (plaintiff) divorced. In 1966, James’s mother, Maybelle Hurley, executed a will establishing a spendthrift trust in favor of James. In 1977, Phyllis sued James in a Missouri court for failure to pay child support. In 1978, Maybelle died. In 1979, Phyllis won a money judgment against James for past-due child support. Maybelle’s will was admitted to probate in Ingham County Circuit Court in Michigan. Phyllis sued James in Ingham County Circuit Court, seeking enforcement of the Missouri judgment through use of James’s trust. The circuit court ruled in Phyllis’s favor and ordered the trustee (defendant) to pay past-due and future child support out of James’s spendthrift trust. The trustee appealed, arguing that the income from the spendthrift trust could not be touched via this judicial process.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Allen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership