Hurst v. Baker
Ohio Court of Appeals
1997 WL 215767 (1997)
John and Effie Lowks owned some ninety-four acres of land, forty of which they sold to William Lowks in 1912. The deed described and conveyed the subject premises, “also a road” bisecting the ninety-four acres. It required John Lowks to keep both sides of the road fenced and without a gate. Hurst (plaintiff), the current owner of the forty acres, sued Baker (defendant), owner of the remaining fifty-four acres, claiming that she had fee simple title to the roadway. Baker answered that the parties had a common easement. The Common Pleas Court of Gallia County held that Baker was the owner of the roadway because the 1912 conveyance transferred not fee simple title, but an easement. Hurst appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stephenson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.