Hutzler v. Hertz Corporation
Court of Appeals of New York
347 N.E.2d 627 (1976)
Christina Hutzler (plaintiff) sued Hertz Corporation (Hertz) (defendant) in New York. The parties settled, and Hertz mailed a settlement check to Hutzler’s attorney, Daniel Yudow. The check was payable to both Hutzler and Yudow. Yudow indorsed the check with his own signature, forged Hutzler’s signature, deposited the check into his account at the Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company (Manufacturers) (defendant), and then disappeared. Hutzler requested that Hertz pay her the amount of the settlement check directly. When Hertz refused, Hutzler sued Hertz and Manufacturers for the amount of the settlement check. The lower court granted Hutzler judgment against Hertz for the amount of the settlement check, but reduced the judgment by the value of the legal services that Yudow had rendered to Hutzler. The lower court granted summary judgment in favor of Manufacturers. Hertz and Hutzler appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Jasen, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.