Hyde v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue

[2000] N.Z.F.L.R. 385 (2000)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hyde v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue

New Zealand Family Court
[2000] N.Z.F.L.R. 385 (2000)

Facts

Natasha Hyde (plaintiff) had a falling-out with her parents when she was about 16 years old. Hyde moved out of her family home and worked while she attended college, but she was unable to support herself. Soon after Hyde moved out, she filed applications for orders for her parents to pay child support to her. Hyde’s applications indicated that she was the child in need of support and that she was her own custodian, known as a guardian in other jurisdictions. Hyde’s applications were denied based on the reasoning that a child could not apply for child support to be paid to herself. Hyde appealed, arguing that because she was providing care for herself, she was her own custodian and was entitled to receive child support in that role.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Carruthers, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership