Hyde v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue
New Zealand Family Court
[2000] N.Z.F.L.R. 385 (2000)
- Written by Meredith Hamilton Alley, JD
Facts
Natasha Hyde (plaintiff) had a falling-out with her parents when she was about 16 years old. Hyde moved out of her family home and worked while she attended college, but she was unable to support herself. Soon after Hyde moved out, she filed applications for orders for her parents to pay child support to her. Hyde’s applications indicated that she was the child in need of support and that she was her own custodian, known as a guardian in other jurisdictions. Hyde’s applications were denied based on the reasoning that a child could not apply for child support to be paid to herself. Hyde appealed, arguing that because she was providing care for herself, she was her own custodian and was entitled to receive child support in that role.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Carruthers, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.