Hydro Resources, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency

608 F.3d 1131 (2010)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hydro Resources, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
608 F.3d 1131 (2010)

Facts

Due to a series of historical events, an area of land in New Mexico abutting the Navajo Reservation became known as the checkerboard region because alternating land parcels were owned by the state, the federal government, the Navajo Nation, individual tribe members, and private persons and entities. Hydro Resources, Inc. (HRI) (defendant) owned a parcel in the checkerboard region outright. There were no inhabitants on the land, the land was not inside any Indian reservation, and the land had not been set aside for Indian use and was not under federal control for Indian benefit. When HRI wanted to mine for uranium, it needed to first obtain the permit required by the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had delegated its authority to issue such mining permits to the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) for all New Mexico mining except mining on Indian lands. Having no reason to think its land might constitute Indian land, HRI obtained the necessary permit from the NMED. The EPA did not question that permit until, sometime later, a dispute arose over the status of HRI’s land. At that point, the EPA issued a decision that HRI’s land qualified as Indian land because it was part of a dependent Indian community. The EPA therefore concluded that HRI needed to obtain a mining permit from the EPA, rather than from NMED. HRI sued the EPA in the federal court of appeals, challenging the EPA’s decision.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gorsuch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 905,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 995 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership