Hygh v. Jacobs
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
961 F.2d 359 (2d Cir. 1992)
William C. Hygh (plaintiff) visited a friend’s house and had a disagreement with his friend. His friend called the police, and Officer William Jacobs (defendant) arrived. Hygh and Jacobs exchanged words and shoves. Jacobs then informed Hygh that he was under arrest and struck Hygh on the cheek. Hygh claimed that Jacobs struck him while Hygh was bending down to pick up his jacket after Jacobs told him he was under arrest. Jacobs claimed that he struck Hygh in self-defense while they were standing up, after Hygh shoved him. The blow broke Hygh’s cheekbones, and plastic surgery was needed to repair the injury. Hygh sued Jacobs and others under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged constitutional violations related to his arrest and the blow by Jacobs. At trial, the plastic surgeon testified that the kind of injury Hygh suffered was from a very strong blow that would likely be caused by a blunt instrument. Jacobs testified that he had a flashlight in his hand during his interaction with Hygh because it took place at night. Hygh called Terry Cox, an expert witness concerning law enforcement. Cox testified that Jacobs had used “deadly physical force” that was not “warranted under the circumstances.” Cox defined “deadly physical force” as “using force in such a way that it has the potential to kill someone.” The jury found in favor of Hygh. Jacobs appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Mahoney, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.