I.C.U. Investigations, Inc. v. Jones
Alabama Supreme Court
780 So. 2d 685 (2000)
- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
Charles Jones (plaintiff) worked as a groundman and truck driver for the Alabama Power Company. While working, Jones suffered a shock, fell from a truck, and broke his shoulder. Jones then underwent surgery. Jones sued Alabama Power for workers’-compensation benefits, and Alabama Power disputed the extent of his injuries. In preparation for that trial, Alabama Power hired I.C.U. Investigations, Inc. (ICU) (defendant) to watch Jones. Two ICU investigators went to Jones’s home and observed Jones, often videotaping his activities. This included videotaping Jones urinating in his yard. The investigators observed and videotaped, however, from a public road, and they never observed Jones’s activities inside his home. When Jones learned of these activities, he sued ICU for, among other things, invasion of privacy. That case went to a jury trial, and after Jones rested his case, ICU moved for judgment as a matter of law. The trial court denied the motion. ICU renewed its motion, which the court again denied. The case was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of Jones. ICU appealed, claiming that the trial court improperly denied its motion for judgment as a matter of law.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.