Iacomini v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
New Hampshire Supreme Court
127 N.H. 73, 497 A.2d 854 (1985)
- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Richard Iacomini (plaintiff) contracted with Theodore Zadlo to repair a Mercedes that Zadlo claimed he owned. In fact, the car did not belong to Zadlo and had been stolen from a car lot. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (defendant) had paid the car owner for the car when the car was stolen. When Liberty Mutual discovered Iacomini had the car, it sued to take possession of the car. Iacomini argued that he had done extensive repairs to the car and was entitled to payment for them. The trial court gave Liberty Mutual the car without requiring payment for the repairs because Iacomini had not been authorized by the car’s real owner to perform any repair work. Iacomini appealed to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, arguing that he was entitled to restitution for the car repairs.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.