Iannuccillo v. Material Sand and Stone Corp.
Rhode Island Supreme Court
713 A.2d 1234 (1998)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The contract between Louis Iannuccillo (plaintiff), Material Sand and Stone Corporation (Material), and C. Pezza & Son, Inc. (Pezza) (defendants) obligated Pezza to blast and remove any exposed rock on Iannuccillo’s worksite. The contract obligated Material to process the removed rock for sale. Pezza’s initial excavation destabilized the adjacent hillside. Town authorities stopped the dig and demanded that Iannuccillo come up with a plan for remediating the situation, which Iannuccillo failed to do. After two months, the authorities let the work resume, but only on condition that Pezza immediately stabilize the hillside. Further digging disclosed the hitherto-unknown presence of a massive, underground stone ledge. The cost of removing the ledge far exceeded the contract price for removing rock from the worksite. Pezza was willing to remove the ledge, but only if Iannuccillo agreed to modify the contract, which Iannuccillo refused to do. Pezza stopped work. Iannuccillo sued Material and Pezza for breach of contract. The trial court dismissed the charge against Material. However, the trial court rejected Pezza’s twin defenses of impossibility and impracticability. Pezza appealed the trial court’s award of damages for Iannuccillo to the Rhode Island Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Weisberger, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.