Iberville Parish School Board v. Louisiana State Board
Louisiana Supreme Court
248 So. 3d 299 (2018)
- Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD
Facts
The Louisiana Legislature passed the Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 55 (SCR 55). SCR 55 created the Minimum Foundation Program (MFP). MFP directed the Louisiana Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) (defendant) to develop and adopt a formula that reflected the minimum cost for a foundational educational program in all public elementary and secondary schools. BESE adopted a formula that considered the number of students in a school district and the students’ special characteristics. Individual charter schools received their allocated funds once a school system received its MFP allocation. Iberville Parish School Board (Iberville) (plaintiff) and the Louisiana Association of Educators (association) (plaintiff) each filed petitions for injunctive and declaratory relief against the BESE and the State of Louisiana (defendant). The cases were consolidated. Iberville and the association also sought preliminary injunctions and permanent injunctions, arguing that SCR 55 unconstitutionally diverted MFP funds from parish and city schools to charter schools. The district court ruled for the BESE and state, finding that charter schools were public schools. The district court ruled that SCR 55 was constitutional and that SCR 55 did not unconstitutionally divert funds allocated by the MFP. The court of appeal reversed, finding that SCR 55 unconstitutionally diverted MFP funds mandated for parish and city schools to charter schools in violation of Article VIII, Section 13(B) of the Louisiana Constitution. The Louisiana Supreme Court granted writs.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Genovese, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.