Iconco v. Jensen Construction Co.

622 F.2d 1291 (1980)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
I
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Iconco v. Jensen Construction Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
622 F.2d 1291 (1980)

RW

Facts

Jensen Construction Company (defendant) won a contract to build a federal government facility as the low bidder. The second-lowest bidder, Iconco (plaintiff), sued Jensen for lost profits, alleging Jensen won the contract only because Jensen misrepresented itself as entitled to a small business preference. Iconco offered the expert testimony of Colonel Walter H. Johnson, the officer in charge of awarding the contract for the project. At one point, Iconco's lawyer asked Johnson a complex hypothetical question reflecting most, but not all, of the other evidence in the case. Johnson's response to the hypothetical indicated essentially that Iconco would have won the contract if it had not been awarded to Jensen. The jury awarded damages to Iconco, and Jensen appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Jensen argued the hypothetical question omitted material facts and therefore was inadmissible.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Arnold, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 790,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Evidence

Key Terms