Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe

794 F.3d 1039 (2015)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
794 F.3d 1039 (2015)

Facts

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) established a framework for regulating gaming on Indian lands. IGRA created three classes of gaming: class I, class II, and class III. Class III gaming was the most heavily regulated. So-called banking card games (e.g., blackjack), in which the house played against other players, were considered class III. Nonbanking card games (e.g., poker), in which players played against each other without house participation, were considered either class II or class III, depending on the state where the gaming occurred. If the state explicitly authorized the gaming or did not explicitly prohibit the gaming, the gaming was class II. Otherwise, the gaming was class III and could be conducted only pursuant to a tribal-state compact authorizing the gaming. The State of Idaho (the state) (plaintiff) and the Coeur d’Alene Tribe (the tribe) (defendant) had executed a tribal-state compact permitting the tribe to offer class III gaming. However, the compact had been interpreted as authorizing only lottery and pari-mutuel betting. In 2014, the state learned that the tribe intended to offer Texas Hold’em poker at the tribe’s casino. The state sued the tribe in federal court, seeking injunctive relief. The tribe moved to dismiss on the grounds of tribal sovereign immunity. The district court denied the motion and issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the tribe from offering Hold’em. The court found that IGRA had severed tribal immunity because IGRA gave district courts jurisdiction over any action brought by a state or a tribe to enjoin class III gaming activities conducted on Indian lands and in violation of a tribal-state compact. Although the tribe had argued that IGRA did not abrogate tribal immunity because Hold’em was class II gaming, the district court rejected that argument. The court noted that Idaho’s Constitution and gaming law explicitly prohibited poker, which meant that poker games like Hold’em could not be considered class II. The tribe appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hawkins, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership