IGEN International v. Roche Diagnostics GmbH

203 F.3d 821 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

IGEN International v. Roche Diagnostics GmbH

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
203 F.3d 821 (1999)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

IGEN International, Inc. (IGEN) (plaintiff) developed a patented diagnostic process based on electrochemiluminescence (ECL). In 1992, IGEN entered into a license agreement with Roche Diagnostics GmbH (Roche) (defendant). IGEN granted Roche the right to develop and market products using the patented ECL technology in a specified field: hospitals, blood banks, and clinical reference laboratories. The licensed field of use specifically excluded any setting in the presence or proximity of a patient, e.g., in homes, at patient bedsides, or in physician offices. IGEN also reserved to itself the right to develop applications of the patented product in the patient point-of-care market. Using its license, Roche eventually developed a product, Elecsys, that weighed between 150 and 200 pounds and was intended for laboratory settings. IGEN was working on developing an instrument, named ECLM, for application in the point-of-care market. ECLM would be small enough to use at a patient’s bedside. Beginning in 1997, Roche representatives visited doctors’ offices to sell models of Elecsys for use in physicians’ in-office laboratories. At least five physicians’ offices purchased an Elecsys product. IGEN discovered Roche’s activities, sued Roche, and moved for a preliminary injunction to stop Roche from further sales of Elecsys to physicians’ offices for use in in-house laboratories. IGEN established that Roche’s conduct likely violated the licensing agreement, eliminated a potential market for ECLM, and deterred potential partners from investing in ECLM. The court conducted a balancing test and granted a preliminary injunction in IGEN’s favor. Roche appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership