Ignacia Alfonso et al. v. Joseph Fernandez et al.

195 A.D.2d 46, 606 N.Y.S.2d 259 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ignacia Alfonso et al. v. Joseph Fernandez et al.

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
195 A.D.2d 46, 606 N.Y.S.2d 259 (1993)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 1991 the New York City Board of Education (the board) expanded the HIV/AIDS Education Program offered in public high schools. Under the expanded program, students were able to access condoms upon request. The board considered providing a parental opt out for the condom-request component of the program but declined to do so on the ground that it would deny condoms to students who needed them. Ignacia Alfonso and other parents (collectively, the parents) (plaintiffs) filed an action against the chancellor of the board, Joseph Fernandez (defendant). The parents argued that the program improperly violated their parental right to control the healthcare services provided to their children. The board argued that the condom distribution was an educational program and not a healthcare service that required parental consent. The board also argued that a parental opt-out provision would result in statutory- and constitutional-law violations and affect the ability of healthcare providers to provide minors with condoms. The trial court returned a verdict in the board’s favor. The matter was appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pizzuto, J.)

Dissent (Eiber, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership