Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Ilkhchooyi v. Best

37 Cal. App. 4th 395, 45 Cal. Rptr. 2d 766 (1995)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...

Ilkhchooyi v. Best

Court of Appeal of California

37 Cal. App. 4th 395, 45 Cal. Rptr. 2d 766 (1995)

Facts

Javad Ilkhchooyi and Mohammad Bahar (Ilkhchooyi) (plaintiffs) were commercial tenants under a sublease with Westar Management, Inc. (Westar) (defendant). In 1989, Westar sent Ilkhchooyi a new lease on a take-it-or-leave-it basis, informing Ilkhchooyi that the new lease was the same as the previous sublease. The lease gave Westar the right to either terminate the lease or increase the minimum rent to market value upon an assignment by Ilkhchooyi. The lease also provided, in small print, that if Ilkhchooyi assigned the premises and received any consideration that was more than the rent under the lease, including consideration for Ilkhchooyi’s business or a covenant not to compete, Ilkhchooyi would pay Westar three-fourths of the excess consideration. Ilkhchooyi sold his business to Ramsin Zobalan, with $40,000 of the sales price intended for a non-compete covenant. Westar demanded $30,000 in exchange for consent to the assignment. Ilkhchooyi refused to pay, and Westar refused to consent to the assignment. Zobalan reduced the purchase price by $40,000 as a result. The trial court found that the profit-sharing clause in the new lease between Ilkhchooyi and Westar was unconscionable and entered judgment for general damages of $40,000 and punitive damages of $30,000 in favor of Ilkhchooyi. Westar appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wallin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,500 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership