United States Supreme Court
462 U.S. 213 (1983)
Police received an anonymous letter implicating Sue and Lance Gates (defendants) in an elaborate illegal drug scheme. The letter contained many details about the couple and their drug business, including how the Gateses would obtain their illegal marijuana to sell and when the next transaction would occur. Based on this information, the police department conducted its own investigation which revealed that parts of the informant’s tip were true, and only one discrepancy between what the informant said would happen and what did happen was uncovered. The police were able to secure a search warrant of the Gateses’ home and car where they found drugs, weapons and other contraband. The Illinois Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s ruling that the search was unlawful. The court held that the anonymous letter and the police detective’s affidavit outlining the police investigation did not support the necessary probable cause needed to obtain the search warrant.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
Concurrence (White, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 201,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.