Impeachment of the President (Roh Moo-Hyun)
Republic of Korea Constitutional Court
Case 16-1 KCCR 609 (2004)
- Written by Kelly Simon, JD
Facts
In 2004, the Korean National Assembly (the national assembly) (plaintiff) began impeachment proceedings against President Roh Moo-Hyun (defendant). Central to the impeachment petition were charges that Roh had made statements that violated the Republic of Korea’s constitution. The national assembly argued Roh made multiple statements that violated his constitutional obligations, including when (1) Roh said he would do anything legal to support the Uri political party, (2) Roh articulated doubts as to the decisions of the National Election Commission, and (3) Roh suggested a national referendum for a confidence vote, even though Roh did not actually initiate a confidence-vote referendum. Subsequently, the Republic of Korea Constitutional Court reviewed the impeachment petition.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.