In re _______ [The Case of the Extraordinary Ability in the Arts and Entertainment: Distinction]
Administrative Appeals Office
File No. WAC 02-196-59736, 26 Immig. Rptr. B2-23 (2002)
- Written by Eric DiVito, JD
Facts
The petitioner (plaintiff) was a theatrical agency that sought to employ the beneficiary as a juggler for a six-month engagement at a Las Vegas hotel. The beneficiary was not a United States citizen. The beneficiary previously worked as a juggler and lead performer on a tour with Ringling Brothers Circus and received favorable newspaper reviews for his performance. The beneficiary also received an international, premier-juggler award at an annual competition of circus performers. The petitioner requested that the beneficiary receive a nonimmigrant visa as an O-1 nonimmigrant under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). In support, the petitioner obtained a favorable consultation statement from the American Guild of Variety Artists (AGVA) regarding the beneficiary’s performance as a juggler. The petition was denied by the director of the California Service Center. The petitioner appealed the holding.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.