In re A

[2000] 4 All ER 961 (2000)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re A

England and Wales Court of Appeal
[2000] 4 All ER 961 (2000)

  • Written by Ann Wooster, JD

Facts

Conjoined twins Jodie and Mary were born joined at the lower abdomen. Each twin had her own brain, heart, lungs, other vital organs, arms, and legs. Mary’s heart and lungs were too weak to pump oxygen and blood throughout her body without Jodie’s assistance via a common artery. If Mary had been born alone in this condition, she would have died shortly after birth. The medical personnel (plaintiffs) responsible for the twins’ care all believed that the girls were separate individuals with separate brains and organs, personalities, and habits. Surgical separation of the twins would involve severing the common artery, resulting in Mary’s death minutes later. Not separating the twins surgically would result in both children dying within three to six months because Jodie’s heart would fail due to the extra effort of keeping her sister’s blood oxygenated. The twins’ parents (defendants) would not consent to the operation because they felt that the twins were equal persons who both deserved to live and that allowing Mary to die would be murder. The parents were devout Roman Catholics who could not agree to kill one child to save the other. The twins’ doctors believed the operation would give Jodie a worthwhile life although Mary would lose her life. The medical personnel responsible for the twins’ care petitioned the court to decide the twins’ legal rights as separate persons for purposes of performing the surgery.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ward, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership