In re Adana Mortgage Bankers, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia
12 B.R. 989 (1981)

- Written by Laura Julien, JD
Facts
Adana Mortgage Bankers, Incorporated (Adana) (debtor) was a mortgage bank that purchased mortgage loans and formed them into pools. Adana contracted with the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), whereby Adana issued mortgage-backed securities and the securities were guaranteed by GNMA. As part of this arrangement, Adana and GNMA entered into guaranty agreements for each transaction. The guaranty agreements set forth Adana’s responsibilities as the issuer of the securities and GNMA’s responsibilities as the guarantor of the securities. The guaranty agreements contained a default provision that required Adana to provide GNMA with advance notice of a bankruptcy filing or GNMA would have the option to declare Adana in default. In February 1981, Adana filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy without first notifying GNMA. In March, GNMA sent written demands to the line banks to turn over all of Adana’s funds. GNMA did not provide notice to Adana or the bankruptcy court regarding its demands to the line banks. The line banks refused GNMA’s demands without an order from the bankruptcy court. Adana filed a motion for contempt against GNMA, alleging that GNMA’s actions violated the stay imposed by the bankruptcy court. GNMA argued that Adana’s petition for relief in the bankruptcy action was void because Adana did not provide GNMA with advance notice of its intent to file for bankruptcy as required by the guaranty agreement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Norton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.