In re Air Crash Disaster Near Bombay, India on January 1, 1978
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
531 F. Supp. 1175 (1982)
- Written by Whitney Waldenberg, JD
Facts
On New Year’s Day 1978, an Air India aircraft crashed into the sea shortly after takeoff from an airport in Bombay, India. Everyone on board the plane was killed. Nearly all the victims were Indian nationals. The personal representatives of the deceased (plaintiffs) filed suit in United States federal district court against several United States corporations (defendants), alleging that the accident was the result of faulty equipment on the plane and that the evidence needed to prove their case was located in the United States. The United States corporations, in turn, asserted that the accident was caused by the pilot and crew’s faulty operation of the plane, and that the evidence needed to prove their defense was located in India, including witnesses and other tangible evidence, access to which had been blocked by Indian government agencies. The United States corporations moved to dismiss the suit on the basis of forum non conveniens and, in connection with their motion, agreed to submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of India, make their employees available to testify in India, and waive any applicable statute of limitations under Indian law.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fitzgerald, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.