In re Al-Fin Corporation's Patent

Chancery Division 1969

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Al-Fin Corporation’s Patent

England and Wales High Court of Justice, Chancery Division
Chancery Division 1969

DC

Facts

On May 6, 1966, Al-Fin Corporation (Al-Fin) (plaintiff) applied for a five-year extension with the comptroller (defendant) on its British letters patent under Section 24 of the Patents Act of 1949. The application cited business loss as the reason for the extension. The loss was attributed to shortages of nickel, a necessary component of the patented product, between 1950 and 1953 caused by the Korean War. In a determination letter, the patent examiner recommended against extension because the Korean conflict did not constitute hostilities under the meaning of Section 24 and indicated that nickel shortages were due to hoarding, not the Korean conflict. The parties jointly submitted a letter to the Foreign Office for a determination of whether the British government recognized North Korea as a foreign state within the meaning of Section 24 during the Korean War. In its reply, the Foreign Office noted that there were officials operating as the Government of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea between 1950 and 1953, but that the British government did not recognize it as a sovereign government. The letter also indicated that English troops were sent to Korea in 1950 to join a group of United Nations-member forces fighting against an attack launched by North Korea on South Korea. The British government considered this attack to be an act of war by North Korea, not an insurrection or civil war. Al-Fin later sought a declaration in the high court on whether North Korea was a foreign state within the meaning of Section 24.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Graham, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership