In re American Homestar of Lancaster, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
50 S.W.3d 480 (2001)

- Written by Emily Pokora, JD
Facts
James and Clara Van Blarcum (plaintiffs) purchased a home from Nationwide Housing System (NHS) that was built by American Homestar (AH) and financed by Associates Housing Financing Services (defendants). The transaction included a home warranty and accompanying Retail Installment Contract Security Agreement (agreement) with an arbitration provision. In 1998, the Van Blarcums filed suit, alleging breach of warranty due to property defects and violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (Warranty Act), the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and the Texas Manufactured Housing Standards Act. The trial court granted NHS and AH’s motion to compel arbitration. The court of appeals reversed the trial court, finding that the Warranty Act applied to invalidate the agreement. NHS and AH filed a writ for mandamus relief. The Van Blarcums argued that the Warranty Act applied and prohibited arbitration. The Van Blarcums claimed that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) instructed that informal dispute resolution was not binding but was merely a prerequisite and that the Warranty Act was not a bar to filing suit, as shown by its statutory language and legislative history. NHS and AH argued that the Warranty Act did not prohibit or even mention arbitration.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Baker, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.