In re Annesley
England and Wales High Court of Justice
Ch. 692 (1926)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
This was an action in England to determine the validity of a decedent’s will which, according to English conflict-of-laws rules, was to be decided according to the law of the decedent’s domicile at her death. The decedent was an 80-year-old English subject-of-origin who moved to France and lived there exclusively for nearly 60 years until her death. The decedent’s will provisions purported to distribute all her personal property and declared the decedent’s intent to keep her English domicile. Under English law, the decedent became a de facto French citizen and was domiciled in France when she died, so French law would apply, and under French law, the will would be invalid because it could only dispose of one-third of the decedent’s personal property. However, under French law, the decedent never became a citizen of France and was an English subject when she died, so English law would apply, and under English law, the will was valid because it allowed a decedent’s personal property to be entirely distributed through a will. Thus, the case presented questions about where the decedent was domiciled at her death and which domicile law applied—its domestic law only or also its choice-of-law rules, because if both applied then there would be no resolution because each jurisdiction would send the question back to the other. Specifically, the law of the country of nationality would invoke the law of the country of domicile, which in turn would invoke the law of the country of nationality.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Russell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.